Arnold Schwarzenegger’s mistress is angry, and threatening to sue Entertainment Tonight over an interview with her ex-husband, Rogelio Baena.
In an interview with ET, Rogelio alleged that Mildred “Patty” Baena told him her 13-year-old child with Schwarzenegger was his own, and felt ‘betrayed’ when he learned the truth last week.
TMZ is reporting that after the interview was aired, Patty’s lawyer sent a letter to ET claiming that Rogelio always knew that the love child wasn’t his and the entertainment channel ran the interview without doing any research, and paid Rogelio “in excess of six figures to spew lies.”
The letter stated that they can prove that Rogelio was out of the country when the child was conceived and only returned after Patty was carrying the child, “Thus, Mr. Baena knew then, just as he knows now, that he could not possibly have been the boy’s father.”
Patty’s lawyers are demanding an apology and a retraction of the story on grounds that “our client has been outrageously defamed.”
So the question is, what do you think? Should Patty be given this win, or is she too deep already?
No comments:
Post a Comment